Monday, March 12, 2012

Gmail - Action Alert: Senate Must Reject New "NAT GAS Act" Subsidies - rejackh@gmail.com

Gmail - Action Alert: Senate Must Reject New "NAT GAS Act" Subsidies - rejackh@gmail.com


In new window
Print all

Action Alert: Senate Must Reject New "NAT GAS Act" Subsidies
X
A hold
X

Reply
More
Russ Vought, Heritage Action info@heritageaction.com via bluehornet.com to me
show details 7:57 AM (56 minutes ago)
Images are not displayed.
Display images below - Always display images from info@heritageaction.com
Jack,
Last week, we asked you to stand with us to oppose yet another big-government boondoggle – the subsidization of natural gas vehicles. Senator Reid delayed the vote until tomorrow (Tuesday), giving big-government interests more time to twist arms and secure votes in favor of energy subsidies.
Senators still need to hear from you: make the call opposing the NAT GAS Act now.
With your help, we can kill the infamous and unnecessary NAT GAS Act. Thank you in advance for making the call and standing on the side of freedom,
Russ Vought
Political Director
Heritage Action for America

Heritage Action: Action Alert: Senate Must Reject New "NAT GAS Act" Subsidies.  Having trouble viewing this email?
If you are reading this, you need to enable images in your email program. Press view images or display images.
Call Your Senators: "No" on NAT GAS
Jack,
Today, the Senate will vote on whether to throw more money at "green energy" subsidies. Please stand with us: oppose the federal government picking and financing industry winners.

The Burr-Menendez-Reid Amendment is the infamous and long-stalled NAT GAS Act. Itsubsidizes  natural gas vehicles – from the production of vehicles and the purchase of these vehicles to building new fueling stations. It also levies a new tax on natural gas.

>> Call your Senators now: tell them to oppose the NAT GAS Act. 

The NAT GAS Act is fast losing support in the House and now we must stop this green energy boondoggle in the Senate. Liberals are pushing the bill: President Obama touted it yesterday during his speech in North Carolina.

Proponents of the NAT GAS Act claim that it is necessary to jumpstart a nascent industry, but this is untrue. Private investments have lead to the advances in natural gas extraction techniques and the technology to use it to power everything from our homes to our vehicles. In fact, Chrysler, GM and Ford have all announced plans to release bi-fuel (gasoline and compressed natural gas) versions of their popular pickup trucks. Clearly, new subsidies aren't necessary for industry progress.

Washington's subsidies for technical progress is a long history of failure. Remember the Carter administration’s Synfuels? Remember how ethanol subsidies were going to free us from foreign oil?
 
>> Take Action Now: Tell your Senators to oppose energy subsidies.


After you make the call, use our call report form to tell us how it went. We’re especially interested in any Senators that oppose this amendment.
Sincerely,

Russ Vought
Political Director
Heritage Action for America
If you are reading
this, you need to enable images in your email program. Press view images or display images.

Heritage Action for America | 321 D Street NE | Washington, DC 20002
This message was intended for: rejackh@gmail.com 

No comments:

Post a Comment