Malihi Ruling Fails - Obama Eligibility Challenges Spread to 6 States Inbox X
Inbox
show details 7:18 AM (5 hours ago) |
MALIHI RULING FAILS Obama Eligibility Challenges Spread to 6 States |
| Fellow Patriot, OUR FAXES ARE WORKING! – KEEP INELIGIBLE OBAMA OFF 2012 ELECTION BALLOTS – FAX THE STATES NOW! Despite the setback, plaintiffs confirmed their taking evidence on the merits to the Secretary of State directly, and likely will appeal. But finally, evidence has been introduced in an American court of how Barack Hussein Obama fails to qualify under our U.S. Constitution for the office of president, and eligibility challenges have spread to six other states. Although none of the lawyers who had appeared in the Georgia proceedings had tried to predict Judge Malihi's decision, several did confirm simply granting them a default victory after Obama and his lawyers expressly stated they would not participate in the hearing provided the American people the opportunity to present the evidence of his ineligibility for the office he presently occupies and seeks to renew in the 2012 general election.In fact, Obama's lawyers rationalized his no-show on Jan. 26 saying "Presidential electors and Congress, not the state of Georgia, hold the constitutional responsibility for determining the qualifications of presidential candidates." OUR FAXES ARE WORKING! – KEEP INELIGIBLE OBAMA OFF 2012 ELECTION BALLOTS – FAX THE STATES NOW! Obama's dream-team of lawyers argued that, because of the electoral system, Barack Hussein Obama IS NOT ACCOUNTABLE TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE!And despite the absurdly faulty ruling by Judge Malihi, that strategy by Obama is backfiring. Right now, patriots in Alabama, Tennessee, Arizona, New Hampshire, and even Illinois – Obama's political stronghold – are directly challenging his constitutional eligibility for the presidency. Patriots in Illinois are being more subtle in their approach, asking instead for a change in state law to allow the vetting of political candidates. Sharon Meroni, the plaintiff leading the charge in Illinois, has long fought inside the system for a way to challenge candidacies there. In her newest case, filed in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Ms. Meroni is petitioning for a judicial review of the state's election procedures as they presently exist. Rather than limiting herself to one target (ahem, Obama), she is targeting the state Board of Elections, members of the board, several country clerks and candidates Dan Duffy and Amanda Howland, among others. Ms. Meroni said her concern is that "only candidates qualified for office under the Illinois and United States Constitutions appear on the ballot." Her case alleges the candidates did not provide sufficient proof that they are U.S. citizens, which the Illinois Constitution of 1970 requires. The state's primary is in March, and this case could have nationwide ramifications. The system established in Illinois essentially allows political parties to determine who runs for office, giving votersonly five days to find out about a filing and assemble a formal objection. And there is no procedure for verifying eligibility – a finer point 'missed' by most states when it came time to set-up electoral procedures. OUR FAXES ARE WORKING! – KEEP INELIGIBLE OBAMA OFF 2012 ELECTION BALLOTS Through the separation of powers, Congress cannot subpoena Supreme Court Justices or the President, unfortunately. BUT Congress can make sure Barack Obama's attempts to intimidate and wage legal warfare against the American people goes nowhere, if any integrity remains in our court system and among our Secretaries of State. This isn't the first time Obama has tried to dismiss the "birther" cause as beneath his notice, but you can bet he and his Washington cronies are gearing up for a national legal battle like no other. In previous cases concerning Obama's birth and citizenship, only certain documents were requested or discussed. But in his Jan. 3 subpoena, Judge Malihi required that Obama bring every document that serious eligibility experts have been discussing from the beginning. In the same subpoena, Malihi ruled that Georgia state law is very clear – any candidate for federal or state office must meet the qualifications of that office and that Georgia electors have the right to challenge those qualifications in court. Malihi flatly denied Obama's motion to dismiss the scheduled court date on January 26 to give Obama the opportunity to lay the issue of his birth and citizenship to rest once and for all. Reportedly, Judge Malihi alsosubpoenaed Hawaii Health Department officials and commanded them to produce an original certified copy of Obama's long form birth certificate… a document which the White House has failed to produce time and time again despite the demands of concerned American Citizens. Obama, as he has done before, stonewalled all demands for evidence, and then refused to respond to the subpoena to appear. And inexplicably, Judge Malihi suddenly reversed himself on all his insistence on upholding the statute, and issued his advisory opinion in a ruling completely in no-show, no-evidence defendant Obama's favor, as having "persuasively" established Obama's eligibility to appear on the Georgia ballot for U.S. president!OUR FAXES ARE WORKING! – KEEP INELIGIBLE OBAMA OFF 2012 ELECTION BALLOTS We know. It sounds too good to be true. But it is nothing but the truth, unlike the hogwash tossed out by the White House to try and pacify us restless U.S. Citizens who are sick-and-tired of Washington's manipulation our freedoms, our borders and our economy. A closer look at the U.S. Constitution shows a very clear requirement, in a unique usage and application of the term, that the president must be a "natural born Citizen" to be eligible for the nation's highest office. And according to the Founding Fathers, a "Natural born Citizen" is distinct and different than "Citizen" and even "native born Citizen." By his own admission that his father was a Kenyan native and British subject, Barack Hussein Obama already does NOT meet the Constitutional standard of "natural born Citizen" that was established by the 1875 unanimous Supreme Court ruling Minor v. Happersett. WHY? Because the Court decided very clearly in this case and in others that a "natural born Citizen" is one who is born on U.S. soil to U.S. Citizen parents. OUR FAXES ARE WORKING! – KEEP INELIGIBLE OBAMA OFF 2012 ELECTION BALLOTS FAILURE TO APPEAR ON THE GEORGIA BALLOT WOULD COST OBAMA DEVASTATING MEDIA, AND 15 ELECTORAL VOTES! BUT WHAT IF HE LOST THEM ALL… That's where YOU AND I come in. Obama needs every vote he can get in 2012 – if we can get just one state to remove his name from their ballots, he does not stand a chance. To do this, though, we need tens of thousands of messages overwhelming the offices of every single Secretary of State, since THEY are the ones who are ultimately responsible for determining who qualifies to be on the ballot – and, of course, who doesn't! It's possible, but we need YOUR help. As our Founding Fathers intended, it is the States which protect us from all out tyranny. The federal election in 2012 and the constitutional eligibility of the candidates is no different. In the end, OUR STATES are responsible for ensuring the eligibility of candidates and OUR STATES will protect us from the tyranny of a presidential usurper. OUR STATES MUST HEAR FROM US. THERE IS NOT A SECOND TO WASTE IN MAKING YOUR VOICE HEARD LOUD AND CLEAR. OUR FAXES ARE WORKING! – KEEP INELIGIBLE OBAMA OFF 2012 ELECTION BALLOTS
|
No comments:
Post a Comment