Ron Paul on Michele Bachmann: ‘She Hates Muslims’ | CowboyByte

Ron Paul on Michele Bachmann: ‘She Hates Muslims’ | CowboyByte

Ron Paul on Michele Bachmann: ‘She Hates Muslims’
Posted on December 18, 2011 by Cowboy Byte



Republican presidential hopeful Ron Paul took some strong digs at his fellow candidates Friday, saying Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann “hates Muslims” and former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum doesn’t like “gay people and Muslims.”

Paul made his comments on “The Tonight Show with Jay Leno” when the host asked him for his take on the other GOP contenders in the field.

On Bachmann, the Texas congressman said: “She doesn’t like Muslims, she hates Muslims, she wants to go get them.”

“Wow, okay, that’s not good,” Leno said.

And Santorum?

“Gay people and Muslims,” Paul answered.

The rest of Paul’s evaluations were decidedly tamer. On Mitt Romney, Paul simply said, “He used to be governor of Massachusetts.”








Continue Reading on www.theblaze.com

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged michelle backhamm, muslims, Rick Santorum, ron paul, tonight show. Bookmark the permalink.
← The health care law raises lots of questions that can’t yet be answeredColorado quarter horse “Tebows” to his owner’s command →
234 Responses to Ron Paul on Michele Bachmann: ‘She Hates Muslims’
Tom says:
December 18, 2011 at 11:08 am
Just more reasons not to vote for Ron Paul. That makes him look stupid and hateful. But no matter, he’ll never be the nominee, much less President.
Reply
Buyerbwear says:
December 18, 2011 at 11:28 am
@Tom–he won’t be now. He has dug himself a hole and jumped in head first, evidently. I was an ardent Ron Paul supporter and, except for his foreign policy, believed (still do) that the changes he would effect once in office would serve all Americans very well (elminating I.R.S., slashing government, auditing the Federal Reserve, etc.). I guess he is now of the thought that running a dirty campaign will increase his chances of becoming President, whereas he ran a fairly clean campaign four years ago, and, for all intents and purposes, was ignored by the media and, thus, a large percenage of the population. As a result, and reluctantly, I will probably switch my support to either Bachmann or Gingrich (can’t bear the thought of either Romney or Perry in the Whitehouse; my skin is crawling at the mere mention). Pity.
Reply
Okole says:
December 18, 2011 at 11:47 am
That was a pretty innocuous interview on the Leno show. Why do you folks have your undies all bunched up. If you liked Paul before the show, why did this change your attitudes. To support Bachman or Gingrich after being a Paul supporter is a WTF brain fart decision.
Reply
dntmkmecomoverther says:
December 18, 2011 at 12:08 pm
Because if we had ANY doubt of his faith foundation or his foreign policy, we have NONE now. Paul would have us eating curry foods so fast it would make your head spin.

Paul followers better go break open their piggy banks and go buy a clue as to this man’s foundational belief system; it seems to be non existent. He has NO foreign policy other than not to have any. He has NO foundational belief system to proffer why we ought to have the freedoms we say are ‘rights given by God’…therefore he has no way to discern WHO/WHAT can and will take them away (like radical islam; muslims, duh!) That’s why Bachman is leary of ‘friendly’ muslims because orthodox islam knows no such follower. That also leaves him ‘blind’ as to why homosexuality and the lobby that supports it is so dangerous to those rights he finds so precious.

I have met Ron Paul and he is a likeable fellow; however,he is not right for the Presidency due to his incredibly naive stance on foreign policy and faith issues; both which translates to horrid statesman decisions if he is elected.
Reply
Mark says:
December 18, 2011 at 1:28 pm
The other candidates foreign policy is to start bombing everybody. That’s not good! YA THINK? Now we have special forces on the Syrian border. WTF!
Katie says:
December 18, 2011 at 1:36 pm
Ron Paul has a foreign policy, and it is an excellent one: don’t aggress against others first.

You learned this rule in the sandbox when you were little. If you treat others disrespectfully, they will retaliate. This is exactly what keeps happening to the US.

Compare us to Switzerland, which gives every man a gun and trains men militarily but does not engage in wars or choose sides in the world. Switzerland has not been attacked in the last 100 years- not by Muslims or
otherwise. They are a much more prosperous and much freer country. Our government size increases and becomes more corrupt with every war. Switzerland doesn’t have this problem.
Chevyek says:
December 18, 2011 at 3:00 pm
You are correct. Paul’s criticism of Bachman & Santorum was not only vicious but unnecessary and gives more fodder to the Dems if either of them are nominated. And his policy of ‘making nice’ with Iran which has threatened not only Israel but America as well & now has the capability of implementing their threats makes Paul not only naive, but dangerous as well.
Anne says:
December 18, 2011 at 12:16 pm
Okole: “Innocuous?”

That was simply a blatant LIE that accomplished NOTHING but to make Paul look more the vindictive fool that he is.

I do not support Bachmann, for a number of reasons, but she was absolutely accurate when she said Ahmadinejad was a “mad-man, and had threatened to destroy Israel and wipe America off the face of the earth, and we cannot afford to “underestimate” him.

ONLY a “mad-man” would even consider negotiating with a “mad-man.”
Reply
Chevyek says:
December 18, 2011 at 3:05 pm
So true…mad man vs mad man., And to Katie, when do we ‘aggress’ against Iran….before they blow us up or after?
Ed Orr says:
December 18, 2011 at 3:56 pm
Ever since Saint Ron Paul was drafted early in the Vietnam war he too has harbored a hatred. He despises the military and has been on a quest to do as much damage as he possibly can to it. Very seldom if ever is this fact discussed or acknowledged by the Church of Ron Paul congregation.
I would love to have a professional body language expert evaluate him. Better yet an unbiased psychiatrists evaluation would be more interesting. maybe his church goers could have his image plastered on the shrinking cover of Time magazine and then the Vatican would do whatever they do to proclaim him a saint.
Dwain says:
December 18, 2011 at 1:06 pm
I liked some things that Paul said but this makes Him sound childish and that is not presidential!!
Reply
tedsmith says:
December 18, 2011 at 1:06 pm
Okole
At the end of the day, I pray the sheeple & candidates, if patriotic, will focus on defeating the muzzie sitting at 1600 Pa ave. This bullshit from this old fart, that believes you should negotiate with the assholes that thier mainobjective is to kill both “Satans” & it’s our fault that brought on 9/11, should relegate him PERMANTLY to the ashheap of candidates.
Yea, he has some good ideas, so did Hitler!!!Hello
Patriot
Reply
Mark says:
December 18, 2011 at 1:30 pm
Troll
Katie says:
December 18, 2011 at 1:40 pm
Hitler’s good ideas are the same as the other candidates’ good ideas: rule the world. Show the world that we are the boss.

Ron Paul approaches the world from the standpoint of blowback- we will cause aggression by being aggressive. Members of our armed forces understand this. This is why they overwhelmingly support Ron Paul. Listen to the soldiers.
Carmelo Junior says:
December 18, 2011 at 1:43 pm
Ron Paul is a pro Muslims NAZI like Hitler
Reply
RICH says:
December 18, 2011 at 3:45 pm
WHAT ARE YOU “SMOKING”
Texan for Texas says:
December 18, 2011 at 1:58 pm
Please never us wtf it stands for world taekwondo federation, and as for Ron Paul he is a well out there his foreign is a joke you can not talk to these people we have tried in ways you do not know, and with out the IRS who will collect the taxes that make the goverment run and pay the military, post office, law enforcement. Just an observation
Reply
Raymond says:
December 18, 2011 at 2:11 pm
The Light of The World
http://www.chick.com/the_story_of_Jesus/
Reply
ladykroft says:
December 18, 2011 at 2:30 pm
okole… muslims are a danger to our country. I’m not so much worried that Bachman hates them as that Paul loves them. It’s no danger to America if Bachman hates them, but it is dangerous that Paul loves them. People who love muslims and defend them are blind to what the muslims long term agenda is. They view us as infidels and the koran requires all muslims to kill the infidels. Ask ANY muslim you know if that isn’t the way it is.
Reply
Corrina says:
December 18, 2011 at 2:47 pm
Trust me, asking a Muslim isn’t going to help you. They will only lie to you and tell you that they are a peaceful religion. They will continuously lie to your face in order to spread their religion and dominate. So asking a Muslim if this is what they are supposed to do will not do.
Chevyek says:
December 18, 2011 at 3:13 pm
True Ladykroft. Any Muslim who has converted to Christianity will agree with you.
John says:
December 18, 2011 at 3:43 pm
I cannot see why more people do not share that knowlege ladycroft! If Michelle Bachman hates muslims, she is my candidate! By the way..how come we cannot get a military general to run for the office like IKE EISENHOWER!
Southerner says:
December 18, 2011 at 2:31 pm
Well!!!!! If you have not really thought something through it is not hard to change when you are faced with realities! Shallow plus Shallow plus Shallow equals = Shallow! We do not need someone who pounds their chest and stand on a soap box making endless comments about others. We need a leader with vision and the fortitude to see it through!
The world we live in is complicated, and if you think you can jump out 50 yards in front a train and stop it dead then continue with Ron Paul. (The movie Hancock was not a reality movie….sorry).
The world spends more in security measures against Islamist Terrorism each year than the whole of what the Allies spent in the 5 years of WWII. And we are not at war with Islam???…..not to mention we are being over run by immigrants who are here to support an attritional Jihad (approaching 56 million in the United States!) Islam openly proclaims a war against the infidel United States! So…????? Why should Bachmann or Santorum like Muslims? Paul seems to think the Iranians are not so bad people, they just have an evil leader….Really????? 40 plus years of extreme Islamic brainwashing has had no affect on them??? That makes about as much sense as a British General trying to convince the King of England they they could recolonize the United Sates 50 years after the Revolutionary War! If you think we are in position to be Isolationist as Mr. Paul proposes then you are so ignorant you probably will not be able to find the voting polls without a GPS!
Reply
Caroline says:
December 18, 2011 at 11:50 am
Anyone in place of what we currently have as a “president” is better.

How could the American people not seen this man for what he was?

Gullible is all I can say. We must hold our nose and vote for someone else.

Being half black is NOT a qualification.
Reply
DocDave says:
December 18, 2011 at 1:15 pm
Reality Check: Has the Patriot Act thwarted 42 terror attacks?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=vhD33mqzGQU
Reply
Rhondar says:
December 18, 2011 at 2:19 pm
They thwarted the attacks they let happen….some even set up like the Christmas tree bomber. They let that nut in Ft Hood shoot up a lot of soldiers though.

Napolitano said the system is working….a lot of those attacks were thwarted by citizens not the feds. In spite of the massive loss of freedoms we are no safer than before 9/11 in reality much less safe. Bombing and invading is not an act of friendship….it draws fire.
Texan for Texas says:
December 18, 2011 at 1:59 pm
I agree
Reply
ladykroft says:
December 18, 2011 at 2:36 pm
Caroline…I agree with your first sentence.

The sad part is that they will vote for him again.

Amen to that!

He’s not even “half black”. 50% white, 31% black, 19% mutt.
Reply
mixplix says:
December 18, 2011 at 3:14 pm
Coffee came out my nose, damn it that was funny.
Robert says:
December 18, 2011 at 2:06 pm
I lost respect for him over his attacks on Gingrich. Bachmann’s attacks on Gingrich in the debate was so bad she lost me as well. When she said Gingrich was pro partial birth abortion because he wouldn’t kick republicans out that refused to vote for the ban that IMHO was a bold faced lie and I cannot vote for someone that twists the truth that much.

As for Muslims and Gays I agree with Santorumm and Bachmann on those issues. Bachmann probably don’t like gays either. LOL
Reply
Dan says:
December 18, 2011 at 2:10 pm
I want to make a prediction: THE TIME WILL COME WHEN YOU WILL WISH YOU HAD VOTED FOR RON PAUL.

Another prediction: IF ANY OTHER REPUBLICAN OTHER THAN RON PAUL GETS ELECTED, NOTHING IS GOING TO CHANGE.
Reply
Rhondar says:
December 18, 2011 at 2:20 pm
They won’t be elected in the first place….remember last election?

I didn’t vote for McCain and I won’t vote for Newt Romney….it’s Paul or NOTHING.
Reply
Dingbat36 says:
December 18, 2011 at 2:36 pm
Than………….like last time, YOU are part of the problem!!

I am one year younger than Ron Paul and I know my limitations, he has not figured out yet that he is too old.

Where is his resume for 34 years in the House of Representatives. I have not seen the man point to ONE accomplishment that he can brag about in ALL THOSE years!!
Albert Roberts says:
December 18, 2011 at 2:40 pm
The one candiate or” I’ll hold my breath and stamp my foot and not vote” attitude is how we got O’dummy.
decarlisle says:
December 18, 2011 at 3:06 pm
Listen to yourself if you dare. At least vote your principles to the very least I vote against pro-abortion and socialism.

Why because its your duty to make a stand of except that you are part of the problem not the answer. Will my person win I do not know will I win for making a stand yes in my eyes and the Lords I do he hates abortion and liberalism when run to the end result leads to that.
decarlisle says:
December 18, 2011 at 2:58 pm
I hope to see Michelle at the lead I have been for her from the beginning, its all up hill because the media fears truth and Christians and they demand perfection from them and little from the left. Did you catch the media campaigning for BO at the Christmas tree lighting?

Unless people wake up and smell the coffee we have a lost decade to say the very least. Paul is little more than a Ross Perot spoiling the election for the left. All he has ever done is help the liberal side during an election just like is he doing now.? Setting up Newt, Michelle and Rick S. I would think it would be foolish of him to say to much of his Governor Perry he does live here you know.

Would Ron Paul bring change without a doubt yes he would maybe even more than BO has and maybe even more dangerous to us and the world.. BO is stirring up the fires of Islam and Paul would ignore them until Pulse Bomb goes off over the USA.

Would he change things sure some change I am sick of people blabbing about change like that in its self is some kind of answer to our problems. This would just be more confusion added to the system even though it sounds like the opposite he would not be able to do all he promises and live out the term if he tried to do what he says. John Kennedy didn’t Ron Paul is no JK. And he is hurting his sons reputation .
Reply
ladykroft says:
December 18, 2011 at 2:38 pm
MERRY CHRISTMAS EVERYONE!!
IF YOU’RE AN ATHEIST OFFENDED BY THIS THEN GOD BLESS YOU.
IF YOU’RE A MUSLIM OFFENDED BY THIS…JESUS LOVES YOU TOO, BUT GO BACK TO THE MIDDLE EAST IF YOU DON’T LIKE IT!
Reply
Leonard says:
December 18, 2011 at 3:13 pm
REMEMBER ! ANYONE OF THESE CANDIDATES WOULD BE BETTER THAN OBAMA! I BELIEVE MICKEY MOUSE WOULD BE BETTER.
Reply
Howard Terry says:
December 18, 2011 at 3:17 pm
I am now an old ww-2 Marine and Bachmann isthe only one I trust to do as she says.Restore our Constitution Then everyother thing will fall into place but with a little nudging
Reply
RICH says:
December 18, 2011 at 3:42 pm
BACHMANN SUPORTS AMESTY FOR OVER 20 MILLION ILLEGALS,SUPPORTS INSTATE TUITION FOR ILLEGAL ALIEN STUDENTS, GINGRICH…IS A TWO FACE…….. AS FOR FOREIGN AFAIRS….IM A VIET NAM VET………NO MORE WARS”"! STOP BEING LED BY “NEO-CONS” IN AMERICAS “DUMB” MIDDLE EAST INTERVENTION”! PAUL THE ONLY “SANE” MAN ON AMERICAS TOTALLY FAILED MIDDLE EAST POLICY’S< FOREIGN AID, AND PHONY PATRIOTIC BULLSHIT""! THE EAGLE HAS LAID MANT A "STINKIN" EGG IN FOREIGN AFFAIRS THAT HAS BROUGHT DISRESPECT FOR OUR PEOPLE…… NO WARS……..NO WARS FOR ISRAEL AND ALL THE LIES……….!
Reply
NancyJ says:
December 18, 2011 at 12:14 pm
Maybe senility struck! He sure is old enough for that.

He seems to be one of those that think he has the ONLY truth. Wrong…
His foreign policy ideas are really off the map. We don’t live on an island.
Reply
Dwain says:
December 18, 2011 at 1:13 pm
Amen!!From the start the only way I would have voted for Him is if He got the nomination.He would be many times better then Obama but I don’t think Paul has a clue on foreign policy.
I just hope He does not run as a third party candidate because that will hand the election to Obama on a silver platter.I have seen some suggesting a write in for Him which would also be a disaster.Those proposing this have a short memory.Ross Perot gave the election to the democrats when He ran as a third party candidate.
Reply
Robert says:
December 18, 2011 at 2:08 pm
The best thing would be for the nominee to announce early that he will appoint Paul to the Federal Reserve and defuse that issue all together. Paul would be very happy in that role and America probably would be as well.
Reply
Dan says:
December 18, 2011 at 2:13 pm
I will vote for Ron Paul if he runs on a third party or write him in.
My conscience will not let me vote for the lesser of two evils.
Reply
Chevyek says:
December 18, 2011 at 3:28 pm
I think Dan has forgotten Ross Perot……his 3rd party caused the Dems to loose….a 3rd party or write in campaign for Ron Paul will do the same for the Repubs & we’ll end up with OB again. If Paul gets the nomination, good, I’ll vote for him. If not, drop it or YOU will be responsible for another 4 years of OB and you’ll spend the next 4 years taking Ambien every night to get to sleep!
Howard Terry says:
December 18, 2011 at 3:37 pm
Dan, I can’t believe you would vote for Obama-nation. I believe you are for that fella that is up there now, because to split the Republican ticket is all you are interested in.
RICH says:
December 18, 2011 at 3:49 pm
I’M WITH YOU DAN………THE NEO CONS IN AMERICA HAVE DUMBED DOWN THE STUDENTS IN SCHOOL AND THE ONCE EVERY FOUR YEAR VOTER!
Rhondar says:
December 18, 2011 at 2:22 pm
Read George Washington’s farewell speech:
George Washington’s farewell address: US foreign policy advice

Observe good faith and justice towards all nations; cultivate peace and harmony with all. Religion and morality enjoin this conduct; and can it be, that good policy does not equally enjoin it – It will be worthy of a free, enlightened, and at no distant period, a great nation, to give to mankind the magnanimous and too novel example of a people always guided by an exalted justice and benevolence. Who can doubt that, in the course of time and things, the fruits of such a plan would richly repay any temporary advantages which might be lost by a steady adherence to it ? Can it be that Providence has not connected the permanent felicity of a nation with its virtue ? The experiment, at least, is recommended by every sentiment which ennobles human nature. Alas! is it rendered impossible by its vices?

In the execution of such a plan, nothing is more essential than that permanent, inveterate antipathies against particular nations, and passionate attachments for others, should be excluded; and that, in place of them, just and amicable feelings towards all should be cultivated. The nation which indulges towards another a habitual hatred or a habitual fondness is in some degree a slave. It is a slave to its animosity or to its affection, either of which is sufficient to lead it astray from its duty and its interest. Antipathy in one nation against another disposes each more readily to offer insult and injury, to lay hold of slight causes of umbrage, and to be haughty and intractable, when accidental or trifling occasions of dispute occur. Hence, frequent collisions, obstinate, envenomed, and bloody contests. The nation, prompted by ill-will and resentment, sometimes impels to war the government, contrary to the best calculations of policy. The government sometimes participates in the national propensity, and adopts through passion what reason would reject; at other times it makes the animosity of the nation subservient to projects of hostility instigated by pride, ambition, and other sinister and pernicious motives. The peace often, sometimes perhaps the liberty, of nations, has been the victim.

(THIS IS HOW WE TREAT ISRAEL….WELL ISN’T IT?)
Reply
Rhondar says:
December 18, 2011 at 2:23 pm
cont….
So likewise, a passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils. Sympathy for the favorite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest in cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter without adequate inducement or justification. It leads also to concessions to the favorite nation of privileges denied to others which is apt doubly to injure the nation making the concessions; by unnecessarily parting with what ought to have been retained, and by exciting jealousy, ill-will, and a disposition to retaliate, in the parties from whom equal privileges are withheld. And it gives to ambitious, corrupted, or deluded citizens (who devote themselves to the favorite nation), facility to betray or sacrifice the interests of their own country, without odium, sometimes even with popularity; gilding, with the appearances of a virtuous sense of obligation, a commendable deference for public opinion, or a laudable zeal for public good, the base or foolish compliances of ambition, corruption, or infatuation.

(THAT IS OUR FOREIGN POLICY IN A NUT SHELL)

As avenues to foreign influence in innumerable ways, such attachments are particularly alarming to the truly enlightened and independent patriot. How many opportunities do they afford to tamper with domestic factions, to practice the arts of seduction, to mislead public opinion, to influence or awe the public councils. Such an attachment of a small or weak towards a great and powerful nation dooms the former to be the satellite of the latter. (ISRAEL AGAIN)

Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence (I conjure you to believe me, fellow-citizens) the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake, since history and experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of republican government. But that jealousy to be useful must be impartial; else it becomes the instrument of the very influence to be avoided, instead of a defense against it. Excessive partiality for one foreign nation and excessive dislike of another cause those whom they actuate to see danger only on one side, and serve to veil and even second the arts of influence on the other. Real patriots who may resist the intrigues of the favorite are liable to become suspected and odious, while its tools and dupes usurp the applause and confidence of the people, to surrender their interests.

~~~~~~~1796~~~~~~~~
Reply
Rhondar says:
December 18, 2011 at 2:28 pm
YOU WHO OPPOSE PAUL’S FOREIGN POLICY ARE ALL SLAVES !

The nation which indulges towards another a habitual hatred or a habitual fondness is in some degree a slave. It is a slave to its animosity or to its affection, either of which is sufficient to lead it astray from its DUTY AND IT’S INTEREST

The father of our country George Washington should be heeded.
Howard Terry says:
December 18, 2011 at 3:50 pm
I can’t believe you folks that are not with us defending Iseral. Can’t any of you see there was NO Isreal in George Washington’s time. This is not 17 80. The whole world has changed. I was an active Marine in fighting against murderers 1942 to 1946. By the way we at no time declared war on Germany they did to us. the same thing has happened now in the middle east.
Dingbat36 says:
December 18, 2011 at 2:38 pm
That was a VERY different world. How naive are you?
Reply
RICH says:
December 18, 2011 at 3:54 pm
YOUR “EAGLE” HAS MADE WAR AN AMERICAN OPERA””FIRST VIET NAN (LIE) KOREA,KUWAIT (LIE) IRAQ (LIE) AFGANISTAN (LIE) GET OBAMA AND GET OUT”! I’M SIC OF THE STUPID AMERICAN GOVERNMENT IN ITS “NO BUSINESS” IN THE AFFAIRS IN THE MIDDLE EAST”"! WE STICK OUR NOSES THEIR BECAUSE OF (AIPAC) AND JEW PROBING”! (AIR FORCE VIET-NAM ERA VET)
DocDave says:
December 18, 2011 at 1:01 pm
Ron Paul On The Tonight Show With Jay Leno

http://www.infowars.com/ron-paul-on-the-tonight-show-with-jay-leno/
Reply
DocDave says:
December 18, 2011 at 1:06 pm
You Like Ron Paul, Except on Foreign Policy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8NhRPo0WAo
Reply
Texan for Texas says:
December 18, 2011 at 2:00 pm
say what!! your joking right?
Reply
DocDave says:
December 18, 2011 at 1:18 pm
Michelle Bushman Trots Out The Oldies

http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/100887.html
Reply
DocDave says:
December 18, 2011 at 1:18 pm
Republican Tea Party Diva Bachmann Attacks Ron Paul on Iran During Iowa Debate

http://www.infowars.com/republican-tea-party-diva-bachmann-attacks-ron-paul-on-iran-during-iowa-debate/
Reply
Anne says:
December 18, 2011 at 2:05 pm
DocDave: “Attack?”

What Bachmann said was absolutely SPOT ON!

I do not support Bachmann, for a number of reasons, but she was absolutely accurate when she said Ahmadinejad was a “mad-man, and had threatened to destroy Israel and wipe America off the face of the earth, and we cannot afford to “underestimate” him.

ONLY a “mad-man” would even consider negotiating with a “mad-man.”
Reply
RICH says:
December 18, 2011 at 4:02 pm
YOUR EXCUSE WAS THE SAME “LIE” GEORGE BUSH JR USED TO DUPE THE NAIVE AND DUMB AMERICANS TO SUPPORT A NON NECESSARY WAR IN IRAQ. WHICH KILLED 5,400 AMERICAN CITIZENS! WAKE UP”"? THE WAR WAS TO DESTROY ISRAEL’S ENEMY,SADDAM. AND, NOTHING MORE’!
Howard Terry says:
December 18, 2011 at 3:52 pm
I am for her Doc.
Reply
Ron says:
December 18, 2011 at 1:34 pm
Ron Paul is truly an old flake, that just needs to retire and go on to his rest home. He will not win this election, nor will he win when he runs in 2016 or 2020, when he is what, 85 years old? He is just a serial presidential runner, for a job he would be scary to have. Michelle Bachmann has shot herself in the foot too, by the way she attacked her opponents in the last debate. Attacking opponents like the way she did, shows she is desperate now. All the remaining candidates need to be showing the weakness of Obummer and his last three + years in office, instead of trying to destroy one another.
Reply
Howard Terry says:
December 18, 2011 at 4:03 pm
Well Ron, If she doesn’t show just what you are voting for when you vote I give her credit for that. But those that are against her no amount of explaination will ever satisfy them . I will not go A.W.O.L because that would give Obama-nation a vote by procsie (sic). It isn’t the spelling it is the subject that matters.
Reply
RICH says:
December 18, 2011 at 4:03 pm
GO DR.RON PAUL”!
Reply
DocDave says:
December 18, 2011 at 2:08 pm
Interview with USS Liberty Survivor Phil Tourney Part in five parts
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4118r-E3dA8
Reply
gundealer1940 says:
December 18, 2011 at 2:09 pm
I don’t get it. Bachman hates Muslims? So what! I am a former Marine (’58-’62) and I too hate Muslims. Their Koran is very specific! Kill all infidels if they do not convert! I am a non converted infidel. They want to kill me and my family. I want to kill them first. They treat women as chattel property, stoning them to death, circumcising them (It’s not actually a circumcision, but a removal of the clitoris so they cannot enjoy sex.) use sharia law to justify vengeance killings, etc., etc. Didn’t everyone see them dancing in the streets for joy (Until the lefty media cowardly pulled it.) when the towers went down and all of those innocent people died a horrible death? Their desire to kill innocent men, women and children makes them lower than any animal who kills to survive. Is this a radical Islamic faction? Hell, no! They are just following the teachings in their “bible”, to kill all of us non believers! So, yes, I do hate Muslims!
Reply
Chevyek says:
December 18, 2011 at 3:35 pm
Truer words never spoken. I have friends who witnessed half a city full of Muslims dancing in the street after 9/11. One of my friends, now deceased, said if he ever saw them dance like that again,it would be their last dance!!
Reply
David says:
December 18, 2011 at 2:13 pm
He may end up helping obama get reelected as a 3rd party candidate.
Reply
T-Texas says:
December 18, 2011 at 2:14 pm
More the reason to vote for a true conservative.
Reply
DocDave says:
December 18, 2011 at 2:51 pm
He is almost the only candidate for President in 2012 who actually served his country.

He was a flight surgeon during Vietnam.

Ron Paul’s popularity is so high among U.S. service members that the Texas
Congressman’s presidential campaign has received more money from U.S.
soldiers than any other Republican candidate in the 2012 presidential race COMBINED.

Reply
DocDave says:
December 18, 2011 at 2:48 pm
Blowback

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=vJUbTA41Fqo
Reply
WARLOC says:
December 18, 2011 at 3:09 pm
I hate Muslims too ISLAM IS TRAINING SOMEONE TO KILL YOU RIGHT NOW I am a MAJOR LEAGUE INFIDEL and believe that We should stop kowtowing to these FRIGGN MUSLOIDS in a Country that is Founded on Christian beliefs.
Reply
GINGER GHENT says:
December 18, 2011 at 3:30 pm
Perhaps it is time for Ron Paul to quit the campaign..besides his radical and dangerous stance on Iran, this latest “interview” makes him look senile. How does he know who hates whom? What is his proof? I had my doubts about his “platform” and now I know I shall never vote for him.
Reply
Wayne Herrod says:
December 18, 2011 at 3:34 pm
Why?Because he tells the truth? She has said she hates Muslims. Just as Santorum dwells on Gays neither of which should be the job of the federal government. People are people, there are some good ones and some bad ones in every group, to lump them into groups is a little , how shall we say, “collectivist” You should listen to Paul more when he says “We are all “individuals”". I doubt that ALL Muslims want to kill all Christians, either. Read your Bible a little more.
Reply
RICH says:
December 18, 2011 at 3:36 pm
I DISAGREE….WITH YOUR UN-INFORMED COMMENT.
Reply
shannon853 says:
December 18, 2011 at 3:43 pm
1 she has a right to her opinion. 2. could she be right? 3. is she just showing her feeling as teh muslums have shown theirs for non muslums? could be!
Reply
Charlotte Juett says:
December 18, 2011 at 3:55 pm
Won’t you be surprised to wake up the day after election to a President elect Paul.
Reply
Adrian Van Gorder says:
December 18, 2011 at 11:10 am
GOOD FOR MECHELE, I FEEL THE SAME WAY!
Reply
Nina says:
December 18, 2011 at 11:25 am
AMEN!!They do not respect our laws or way of life,they want to change Europe’s,America’s people to bow down to their so called “god”.I will die first before I give up my faith before I become a puppet to them.I too say “Good for Michele..its about time we as a American People stood up and say it like it is,I am really tired of wimpy,politically correct politicians.
Reply
Iron Angel says:
December 18, 2011 at 11:29 am
Exactly right!
Reply
Basil BuddhaCat says:
December 18, 2011 at 11:42 am
Another-nother Meme.
Reply
Garry says:
December 18, 2011 at 11:52 am
I say Go Bachmann,God Bless America.Get rid of the wimps in our USA
Reply
DocDave says:
December 18, 2011 at 2:27 pm
Reverend Tex Mars
http://www.texemarrs.com/032007/synagogue_of_satan_article.htm
Reply
Listener says:
December 18, 2011 at 2:32 pm
When do their visa’s expire? Time to close the borders to those who hate America.
Reply
John says:
December 18, 2011 at 11:32 am
Me too.
Reply
Basil BuddhaCat says:
December 18, 2011 at 11:42 am
Another Meme.
Reply
Anthony Bennett says:
December 18, 2011 at 11:35 am
I Do, Too!
Reply
Basil BuddhaCat says:
December 18, 2011 at 11:40 am
Meme.
Reply
Basil BuddhaCat says:
December 18, 2011 at 11:43 am
Mechele ? Meme.
Reply
Anne says:
December 18, 2011 at 12:20 pm
Gee Basil: Not a lot of cogent, intelligent comments there.

Do you have ANYTHING of worth to contribute, or are you just satisfied with making the same insufferably stupid comment time and again?
Reply
Dwain says:
December 18, 2011 at 1:25 pm
He can’t help.It the weekend and He slept in and hasn’t had His coffee yet so He isn’t awake yet!Chance though that He won’t be any better when He has His coffee!!
Reply
Anne says:
December 18, 2011 at 2:06 pm
Dwain: And being a slobbering Paul-bot doesn’t help either.
Wayne Herrod says:
December 18, 2011 at 3:35 pm
Perhaps you just don’t know what the word means?
Reply
DocDave says:
December 18, 2011 at 1:12 pm
I like a lot about you Michele. Unfortunately, you have a big problem in HONORING and DEFENDING the 4th Amendment( and others in the Bill of Rights) to the Constitution when you voted for the UN-lawful, UN-patriotic so called “patriot act” extension with secret provisions.

i
The First 10 Amendments to the
Constitution as Ratified by the States

December 15, 1791
Preamble

Congress OF THE United States
begun and held at the City of New York, on Wednesday
the Fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best insure the beneficent ends of its institution

RESOLVED by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, two thirds of both Houses concurring, that the following Articles be proposed to the Legislatures of the several States, as Amendments to the Constitution of the United States, all or any of which Articles, when ratified by three fourths of the said Legislatures, to be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of the said Constitution; viz.:

ARTICLES in addition to, and Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, proposed by Congress, and ratified by the Legislatures of the several States, pursuant to the fifth Article of the original Constitution.

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Amendment II

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Amendment III

No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.
Amendment IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Amendment V
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Amendment VI

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
Amendment VII

In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
Amendment VIII

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
Amendment IX

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

You need to hold to your oath to honor and defend the Constitution. Newt is going down. Ron Paul is The One. He is the real deal. Haven’t had one like him since Barry Goldwater. Don’t be a Tory, be a Patriot and embrace him. He is the One.
Reply
DocDave says:
December 18, 2011 at 1:26 pm
“Of all the enemies to public liberty, war is perhaps, the most to be
dreaded because it comprises and develops the germ of every other.
War is the parent of armies; from these proceed debts and taxes …
known instruments for bringing the many under the domination of the few.…
No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare.”
–James Madison

“The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism” from the book “1984” by George Orwell
It does not matter if the war is not real, or when it is real, it does not matter if victory is not possible…..The war is not meant to be won, it is meant to be continuous…..The essential act of modern warfare is the destruction of the produce of human labor…. A hierarchial society is only possible on the basis of poverty and ignorance…In principle the war effort is always planned to keep society on the brink of starvation…..The war is waged by the ruling group against it’s own subjects, and it’s object is not victory over Eurasia or East Asia ( or Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, or Iran or now LIBYA, or JORDAN or SYRIA or PAKISTAN) but to keep the very structure of society intact.

George Orwell
1984

http://www.WarIsARacket.com
Reply
DocDave says:
December 18, 2011 at 1:29 pm
We live in a Welfare/Warfare/Wall Street State.
I’d like to share two Great Myths of the false left-right paradigm of the twin wings of the Ruling Party that I have discovered over the course of my awakening and independent studies. I think that they can help begin to explain why our world is on the precipice of annihilation and subjugation by totalitarian government.

Myth #1: Fascism and communism are polar opposites.
They are both branches of the same Marxist tree–and this Myth has been thoroughly discredited by a great many scholars and intellectuals. For an exceptional examination of this very subject, check out the insightful documentary film “The Soviet Story”.
http://www.veoh.com/browse/videos/category/news/watch/v19964362qTTd86Zf
The powerful elite want us to argue based on a Right vs. Left theory. The right extreme being Facism and the Left extreme being Communism. Either way, those in power retain power. They really don’t care if it is right or left. It is a false paradigm, intended to entrap the human mind in a box of limited vision and questions. It may go back further than I’m going to talk about, but the early twentieth century social scientists who worked for the international banksters utilized it, and the international banksters funded both Trotsky who they sent to Russia, and Hitler in Germany.

Our founding fathers looked at a different political spectrum. One that had Tyranny (the antithesis of Liberty and Freedom- 1984 like) as an extreme; and Anarchy ( Mad Max or Road Warrior) as the other. They were looking to forge a system that had just enough “control” to keep us out of the chaos or Anarchy but to err on the side of Liberty and Freedom..

I invite you to realize, if you focus on the Tyranny/Anarchy paradigm while focusing on Freedom and Liberty, then all the garbage that we see on a daily basis on right vs. left is moot since both sides have their way of slowly revoking our Liberties and Freedoms. We let them revoke our freedoms only if it is a leader from our team. The left like war only when their leader is in office (Bosnia/Afghanistan). The right hate government intervention unless their leader is in the office (Patriot Act).

We’ve probably all been guilty when it comes to rooting only for my team, or as we commonly say it “the lesser of two evils” (which is still evil). The Left/Right Paradigm, is a way of keeping Americans away from thinking for themselve’s. There is no talk about our founding fathers in congress these days, except from a few Constitutionalists. Our founding fathers hated the idea of The Parties; People fighting and picking sides, instead of following whats really important, The Constitution.

Myth #2: Only leftists are opposed to interventionist war, the police/surveillance state, and completely arbitrary violations of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
Today, to espouse a non-interventionist foreign policy is to commit the alleged sin of “isolationism” according to the grand mentioners in the media, intelligentsia, and government “leaders” and/or to identify oneself as a so-called left-liberal. Yet, the real diplomatic isolationists are those that perpetuate an interventionist foreign policy of aggressive, undeclared war, empire, and arbitrary abuses of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The real right is in favor of the absence of these abusive and dictatorial government powers and the presence of justice according to nature’s law.
Reply
Anne says:
December 18, 2011 at 2:11 pm
DocDave; And this all boils down to the fact that YOU, Paul, and all the other little sanctimonious Paul-bots seem to be missing the BIG PICTURE HERE!

The BIG PICTURE being that Ahmadinejad and every imam in the world, have promised to destroy Israel and wipe America off the face of the earth.

That’s a FACT JACK!

To allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon is as good as signing our own death warrant.
Dingbat36 says:
December 18, 2011 at 2:48 pm
The dictionary definition for fascism is:

fas·cism
   [fash-iz-uhm]
noun
1.
( sometimes initial capital letter ) a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.

Sounds like this is exactly what we have right here at home right now!!
Angel says:
December 18, 2011 at 11:12 am
Ron is just a nitwit, who is crazy enough to vote for this guy? He does not have a chance, but to embarass himself.
Reply
Dwain says:
December 18, 2011 at 1:19 pm
I feel the same but He would be better then Obama and those that say they will stay home if they do not like the Republican candidate are stupid because everyone who stay home is giving 1/2 a vote to Obama and I think it will be close enough that the stay at home Republicans could give the election to Obama.
Reply
jim says:
December 18, 2011 at 11:12 am
I USE TO LIKE RON PAUL , NOW I HATE HIM AS MUCH AS MUSLIMS ………ME

I know lets give iran nukes and tell them were sorry ….ron your soooooooo far out of touch with some things I cant believe I voted for you in the last presidential primary in 2010
Reply
jim says:
December 18, 2011 at 11:26 am
sorry 2008 ……….what ? its early
Reply
danimal says:
December 18, 2011 at 11:12 am
Our money has In God We Trust printed on it , if you don’t like it, get the f— out. Way to go Michele
Reply
CJ says:
December 18, 2011 at 11:44 am
You mean this worthless piece of paper which has no value. We should take In God We Trust off this useless paper because money is the root of all evil. Since the Fed Reserve prints (actually, our gov’t prints it, the Fed buys it for about 3 cents a bill, we then borrow it at full face value plus interest, what a scam) this fiat money, we should have a picture of Satan on it. Maybe then people will wake up to the reality of just how corrupt and evil a central bank is- all money is debt.
Reply
Ron says:
December 18, 2011 at 12:00 pm
Wrong! The LOVE of money is the root of evil! Read your Bible.
Reply
Red Train says:
December 18, 2011 at 12:13 pm
Right on Ron,
People should get things right before they open their mouths. I’m all for Bachman, I just can’t decide on who I’d like to see as her running mate. Whoever it is , we need to go for the throats of these Rinos who would just as easily fit into the Democrap organization. Probably Gingrich because he could be controlled to some degree and has much knowledge as opposed to the idiot from Deleware.
Reply
WARLOC says:
December 18, 2011 at 3:14 pm
Same here and I think if she would pick a strong running mate early she just might get a jump on the FRIGGN MSM SPIN MACHINE and have a shot at winning
Dwain says:
December 18, 2011 at 1:21 pm
CJ almost sounds uninformed enough to be a liberal!
Reply
J says:
December 18, 2011 at 12:06 pm
The Bible does not state that money is the root of all evil. It says the LOVE of money is the root of evil.
Reply
weary conservative says:
December 18, 2011 at 12:36 pm
No, money isn’t the root of all evil; LOVE OF money is the root of all evil. Big difference.
Reply
Dingbat36 says:
December 18, 2011 at 2:50 pm
You misquote…………the LOVE of money is the root of all evil.
Reply
Kevin Miller says:
December 18, 2011 at 11:19 am
Nothing wrong with hating a Hate Group.But,this interview is yet another reason why
Ron Paul is as bad a choice for nominee or president as Romney is! Attacking your
opponent of your own party with lies is as low as a candidate can get! Truly,the ONLY
person in this new Executive Branch election is the muslim-in-chief,himself! Personally,
I’d rather have Bachman and Santorum at the forefront for nomination.I think either
one could beat oBUMa!
Reply
Kevin Miller says:
December 18, 2011 at 11:22 am
I didn’t finish one of my statements:Truly the ONLY one who is running for the
Executive Branch in this election who DESERVES to be attacked is oBUMa!
Reply